中文版
文 | Prince John王国权
"你如何判断他们效忠的对象是谁？……中美一旦开战，似乎就应该把能找到的华裔美国人统统抓进拘留营。"
——伊恩·克罗斯兰（Ian Crossland），《Timcast IRL》节目联合主持人，2026年8月14日
图注：伊恩·克罗斯兰在《Timcast IRL》节目录制中。2026年8月14日，他在该节目中发表了"应将美籍华人关进拘留营"的言论。
Timcast IRL (Podcast Series 2019– ) - Ian Crossland as Self - Co-Host, Self - Host, Self - IMDb
一、一句话，炸开了华人圈的沉默
2026年8月14日，美国右翼头部播客《Timcast IRL》在YouTube上播出了一期节目。这档拥有270多万订阅、亲特朗普阵营的极右翼节目，在假想"中国军队从阿拉斯加登陆"的战争场景时，联合主持人伊恩·克罗斯兰突然把话题转向了在美华人。
他的逻辑链条是这样的：
"你没法分辨谁是中国人、谁是美国人，也没法预判忠诚会不会随战局翻转，所以中美一旦开战，似乎就应该把能找到的华裔美国人统统抓进拘留营。"
更离谱的是，8月18日，克罗斯兰亲自在社交媒体上认领："是说过，删不掉了。"
节目老板蒂姆·普尔事后出来"打圆场"，承认按种族关人是错的，转头又说克罗斯兰只是"表达方式欠妥"，话题本身"值得深入探讨"。
而节目中的另一位嘉宾、评论员菲尔·拉邦特说了一句非常到位的话：
"光把这种念头当'可讨论选项'本身就在给它洗白。有些话根本不配摆上台面认真辩论，一旦你正儿八经地分析它的操作可行性，就等于默认这是个'选项'。"
图注：美国各地爆发的"停止亚裔仇恨"（Stop Asian Hate）抗议活动。近年来，针对亚裔的歧视与暴力事件持续上升。
二、三位国会议员站了出来
8月26日，三位华裔联邦众议员发表联合声明，对这番言论予以最强烈的谴责。
他们是国会亚太裔委员会（CAPAC）主席孟昭文（Grace Meng，纽约州）、众议院民主党党团副主席刘云平（Ted Lieu，加州），以及CAPAC荣誉主席赵美心（Judy Chu，加州）。
图注：左起——国会亚太裔委员会主席孟昭文、众议院民主党党团副主席刘云平、CAPAC荣誉主席赵美心。三位华裔议员于2026年8月26日发表联合声明，强烈谴责克罗斯兰的种族主义言论。
三位议员在声明中指出：
"将华裔美国人与外国政府混为一谈，不仅否定其美国公民身份，也可能在现实生活中加深公众猜疑，助长歧视、仇恨与暴力。将华裔血统与政治忠诚挂钩，是美国社会长期存在的种族主义偏见，延续了把亚裔美国人视为'永远的外国人'的错误观念。"
声明还明确提到了二战日裔拘禁的历史，警告"美国不能重蹈覆辙"。美国日裔公民联盟（JACL）也单独发表声明谴责，提到"美国政府已正式承认拘禁日裔是严重不公，不能以史为鉴却又开历史倒车"。
图注：本文作者Prince John王国权与美国国会亚太裔委员会主席孟昭文议员。
三、144年，历史在轮回
这条时间线，让人不寒而栗：
图注：19世纪末，华人移民在旧金山港接受入境审查。《排华法案》（1882年）是美国历史上第一部针对特定族群的联邦移民限制法。
表格
年份
事件
本质
1882
《排华法案》
美国历史上第一部针对特定族群的联邦移民限制法，禁止华工入境，禁止华人入籍
1942
罗斯福签署第9066号行政令
约12万日裔美国人（其中约2/3是美国公民）被强制离开家园、关进集中营
1988
《公民自由法》
国会正式承认日裔拘禁源于"种族偏见、战争恐慌和政治领导失误"，向幸存者道歉并赔偿
2018-2022
"中国行动计划"
司法部以"反间谍"为名大规模调查华裔科学家，2022年因证据不足和种族争议被停用
2026
播客言论
“开战就把所有华人抓起来"
图注：二战期间日裔美国人集中营——加州曼赞纳（Manzanar）。约12万日裔被强制拘禁，其中约三分之二为美国公民。1988年，美国国会正式承认这是"种族偏见、战争恐慌和政治领导失误"造成的严重不公。
从"不让进来"（排华法案）→ "把已经进来的关起来"（日裔集中营）→ "怀疑进来的都是间谍"（中国行动计划）→ "开战就把所有人抓起来"（播客言论）。
144年过去了，底层逻辑没变——按血统预设忠诚。
四、从性别平等，到人人平等
作为联合国妇女地位委员会大会（CSW）官方论坛主持人及官方代表，我长期致力于维护女性权利平等、性别平等。在联合国的大厅里，我们讨论的是如何让每一个女性——无论她来自哪个国家、哪个种族、哪个阶层——都能享有平等的机会和尊严。
图注：联合国妇女地位委员会（CSW）标志。该委员会是联合国框架下促进性别平等与女性赋权的核心机构。
70th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW70) (9-19 March 2026): Overview · Indico.UN
性别平等的核心信念是什么？是"人人生而平等"——不因性别而区别对待。
那么，种族平等的核心信念是什么？同样是"人人生而平等"——不因肤色、血统、面孔而区别对待。
如果我们反对因为一个人是女性就否定她的能力，那我们同样应该反对因为一个人长着东亚脸就质疑他的忠诚。
平等，从来不应该有边界。 性别平等、种族平等、宗教平等、国籍平等——它们共享同一个根基：对"人"的尊重。
五、华人给美国带来了什么？
克罗斯兰的言论，完全无视了一个基本事实：华人为美国社会做出了巨大贡献。
图注：19世纪华工参与修建太平洋铁路的历史照片。成千上万的华工冒着生命危险在崇山峻岭中开凿隧道、铺设铁轨，建成了这条改变美国命运的"钢铁大动脉"。
Geisel Library Exhibit Sheds Light on Chinese Workers Who Built Transcontinental Railway
19世纪，成千上万的华工冒着生命危险，在 Sierra Nevada 的崇山峻岭中开凿隧道、铺设铁轨，建成了横贯北美大陆的太平洋铁路。没有华工，就没有这条改变美国命运的"钢铁大动脉"。
图注：华裔诺贝尔物理学奖得主崔琦（Daniel Chee Tsui）。20世纪以来，华裔科学家在物理学、医学、计算机等领域屡获殊荣，为美国科技进步做出了不可磨灭的贡献。
Chinese-American scientist Daniel Chee Tsui won Nobel Prize in Physics | Today in History | Fun Fact | Our China Story
20世纪以来，华裔科学家在物理学、医学、计算机等领域屡获殊荣。从诺贝尔奖得主崔琦，到在硅谷推动技术革命的企业家，再到在抗疫一线奋战的医护人员——华人从未缺席。
今天，华裔美国人经营着无数小企业，缴纳着数十亿美元的税款，抚养着下一代美国公民，穿着军装为美国服役。
他们的护照上写着"United States of America"，他们的忠诚不应该因为一张东亚脸就被质疑。
六、理性看待：不能以偏概全
当然，我们必须诚实。
华人社区里确实有鱼龙混杂的现象。有人造假学历、有人打黑工、有人钻法律空子。这些行为不仅损害了华人社区的形象，也伤害了守规矩的华人移民的利益。
但是，任何群体都有害群之马。
美国历史上，爱尔兰移民曾被贴上"酗酒、暴力"的标签，意大利移民曾被污名化为"黑手党"，犹太移民曾遭受系统性排斥。今天，这些群体早已融入美国主流社会，成为美国不可或缺的一部分。
我们不能因为个别华人的不当行为，就给整个族裔贴上"不忠诚"的标签。
正如我们不会因为有男性犯罪者就否定所有男性，不会因为有白人至上主义者就否定所有白人——我们同样不应该因为有华人违法者就否定所有华裔美国人的公民身份和忠诚。
七、这不只是华人的事
克罗斯兰的言论一旦成为政策，受害者绝不会止于华人。
二战期间，被关进集中营的不只是日裔——长着"东方脸"的韩裔、华裔甚至部分东南亚裔都曾受到牵连和歧视。按面孔执法的人，根本分不清你是中国人、日本人、韩国人还是越南人。
今天他们会煽动排华，明天谁知道他们还会不会煽动排斥其他族群？
约五分之一的美国成年人仍相信华裔对美国国家安全构成潜在威胁——这个数字本身就意味着，"东亚脸"在美国社会仍然是一种"原罪"。
这种"永远的外国人"（Perpetual Foreigner）偏见，是亚裔美国人研究中的经典概念：无论在美国生活多少代、说多标准的英语、拿多正的护照，一张东亚脸就让你"看起来不像美国人"。
图注："停止亚裔仇恨"抗议活动中，示威者高举美国国旗。克罗斯兰的言论一旦成为政策，韩裔、日裔、东南亚裔等所有"东亚脸"都将受到牵连。
八、写在最后
2026年了。AI时代、全球化时代、信息爆发时代。
我们却在讨论"要不要把某个族裔关进集中营"——而且是在一个拥有270万订阅的头部播客上，被当作一个"值得探讨的选项"。
这让我想起三位议员声明中的那句话：
"这些言论是危险且不可接受的，它们在我们的国家没有立足之地，我们对此予以最强烈的谴责。"
作为联合国妇女地位委员会大会（CSW）官方论坛主持人及官方代表，我始终相信：平等不是施舍，而是文明社会的底线。 性别平等如此，种族平等如此，对每一个"人"的尊重，更是如此。
而我，想以个人身份多说几句。
作为一位纯正的中国人，但我早已把纽约当作是我的第二故乡。在这片土地上，我遇到了太多美好的人——在联合国共事的各国同仁，在时代广场地球日音乐会上并肩演出的伙伴，在林肯中心、卡内基音乐厅同台献艺的艺术家，包括格莱美奖和艾美奖得主们；在圣帕特里克节游行中热情招呼我的陌生人，在教堂做礼拜时对我微笑的教友，甚至是在街头迷路时耐心为我指路的警察和路人。他们来自世界各地，有着不同的肤色与口音，却做着同样的公益慈善活动，并且都向我展现了最大的善意与包容。
美国本就是一个移民国家，我遇到的许多所谓"纯正老外"，其实也都带着各自的故乡与故事来到这里。正因如此，当我看到有人因为血统就被质疑忠诚、因为面孔就被当作"潜在敌人"时，我感到的不仅是愤怒，更是深深的悲哀与不解——一个曾经用如此温暖的胸怀接纳我的国家，怎么会在一百多年后的今天，重新讨论起按种族抓人？
美国是一个移民国家。它的伟大，不在于它排斥了谁，而在于它接纳了谁。
不要让144年前的排华法案，在2026年换一张脸回来。
图注：亚裔美国人抗议活动中，示威者高举"We Belong Here"（我们属于这里）标语。无论血统与面孔，每个人都应被平等对待。
本文部分图片素材来源于网络，仅供说明之用。
作者简介
图注：本文作者Prince John（王国权）出席联合国妇女地位委员会大会庆典时装秀表演，创造中国人在该舞台的历史首秀。
王国权（Prince John），国际主持人、歌手，纽约州参议院与纽约市议会授予"情歌王子·国际主持人"官方荣誉证书，联合国妇女地位委员会大会（CSW）官方论坛主持人及官方代表。曾与艾美奖及格莱美奖得主合作演出，并受邀在纽约林肯艺术中心、卡内基音乐厅、纽约市政厅、哥伦比亚大学、耶鲁大学等世界级文化殿堂与顶尖学府担任主持及演唱嘉宾。2026年4月，作为重量级嘉宾出席第56届世界地球日时代广场音乐会。
English Version
By Prince John (Wang Guoquan)
From the Chinese Exclusion Act to the "Podcast Internment Camp": What Does an East Asian Face Mean in America?
"How do you know who they're loyal to?... If China and the U.S. go to war, it seems like we should just round up all the Chinese Americans we can find and put them in internment camps."
— Ian Crossland, Co-host of Timcast IRL, August 14, 2026
Caption: Ian Crossland during a Timcast IRL recording. On August 14, 2026, he made remarks suggesting that Chinese Americans should be placed in internment camps in the event of war between China and the U.S.
Timcast IRL (Podcast Series 2019– ) - Ian Crossland as Self - Co-Host, Self - Host, Self - IMDb
I. One Sentence That Shattered the Silence in the Chinese Community
On August 14, 2026, the right-wing podcast Timcast IRL aired an episode on YouTube. With over 2.7 million subscribers, this pro-Trump, far-right program was imagining a war scenario in which "Chinese troops land in Alaska and push through Canada into the U.S. mainland." Suddenly, co-host Ian Crossland turned the conversation toward Chinese Americans in the United States.
His logic went like this:
"You can't tell who's Chinese and who's American, and you can't predict whether their loyalty will flip with the war situation. So if China and the U.S. go to war, it seems like we should just round up all the Chinese Americans we can find and put them in internment camps."
Even more absurdly, on August 18, Crossland personally claimed the statement on social media: "I said it. Can't take it back."
The show's owner, Tim Pool, later came out to "smooth things over," admitting that detaining people based on race was wrong, but then added that Crossland's only fault was "poor phrasing" and that the topic itself was "worth exploring in depth."
Another guest on the show, commentator Phil Labonte, put it perfectly:
"The mere act of treating this idea as a 'debatable option' is already whitewashing it. Some things don't deserve to be put on the table for serious debate. Once you start analyzing its operational feasibility in earnest, you've already tacitly accepted it as an option."
Caption: "Stop Asian Hate" protests across the United States. In recent years, discrimination and violence against Asian Americans have continued to rise.
II. Three Congressmembers Stood Up
On August 26, three Chinese American members of Congress issued a joint statement condemning these remarks in the strongest possible terms.
They were CAPAC Chair Grace Meng (D-NY), House Democratic Caucus Vice Chair Ted Lieu (D-CA), and CAPAC Honorary Chair Judy Chu (D-CA).
Caption: Left to right — CAPAC Chair Grace Meng, House Democratic Caucus Vice Chair Ted Lieu, and CAPAC Honorary Chair Judy Chu. The three Chinese American lawmakers issued a joint statement on August 26, 2026, strongly condemning Crossland's racist remarks.
The three lawmakers stated in their declaration:
"Conflating Chinese Americans with a foreign government not only denies their American citizenship but may also deepen public suspicion in real life, fueling discrimination, hatred, and violence. Linking Chinese ancestry to political loyalty is a long-standing racist prejudice in American society, perpetuating the erroneous notion that Asian Americans are 'perpetual foreigners.'"
The statement explicitly referenced the World War II internment of Japanese Americans, warning that "America must not repeat its mistakes." The Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) also issued a separate condemnation, noting that "the U.S. government has formally acknowledged the internment of Japanese Americans as a grave injustice; we cannot learn from history only to reverse course."
Caption: The author, Prince John (Wang Guoquan), with Congresswoman Grace Meng, Chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC).
III. 144 Years: History Repeats Itself
This timeline sends chills down the spine:
Caption: Chinese immigrants undergoing inspection at the Port of San Francisco in the late 19th century. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was the first federal immigration restriction law in U.S. history targeting a specific ethnic group.
表格
Year
Event
Essence
1882
Chinese Exclusion Act
The first federal immigration restriction law in U.S. history targeting a specific ethnic group, banning Chinese laborers from entering the country and prohibiting Chinese immigrants from naturalization
1942
FDR signs Executive Order 9066
Approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans (about two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens) were forcibly removed from their homes and placed in internment camps
1988
Civil Liberties Act
Congress formally acknowledged that the internment of Japanese Americans stemmed from "racial prejudice, wartime hysteria, and a failure of political leadership," and issued an apology with reparations to survivors
2018–2022
China Initiative
The Department of Justice launched large-scale investigations of Chinese American scientists under the guise of "counter-espionage"; suspended in 2022 due to insufficient evidence and racial controversy
2026
Podcast remarks
"Round up all the Chinese when war breaks out"
Caption: Manzanar, a Japanese American internment camp in California during World War II. Approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans were forcibly interned, about two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens. In 1988, the U.S. Congress formally acknowledged this as a grave injustice caused by "racial prejudice, wartime hysteria, and a failure of political leadership."
From "keep them out" (Chinese Exclusion Act) → "lock up those already here" (Japanese American internment) → "suspect everyone here of being a spy" (China Initiative) → "round them all up when war breaks out" (podcast remarks).
144 years have passed, yet the underlying logic remains unchanged: presuming loyalty based on bloodline.
IV. From Gender Equality to Equality for All
As the Official Forum Host and Official Representative of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), I have long been committed to advancing women's rights and gender equality. In the halls of the United Nations, we discuss how every woman—regardless of her country, race, or social class—deserves equal opportunity and dignity.
Caption: Logo of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW). The Commission is the principal global intergovernmental body exclusively dedicated to the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women.
70th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW70) (9-19 March 2026): Overview · Indico.UN
What is the core belief of gender equality? It is that "all human beings are born equal"—we should not treat people differently because of their gender.
Then what is the core belief of racial equality? It is the same: "all human beings are born equal"—we should not treat people differently because of their skin color, ancestry, or facial features.
If we oppose denying someone's ability simply because she is a woman, then we should equally oppose questioning someone's loyalty simply because they have an East Asian face.
Equality should never have boundaries. Gender equality, racial equality, religious equality, nationality equality—they all share the same root: respect for every human being.
V. What Have Chinese Americans Contributed to America?
Crossland's remarks completely ignore a fundamental fact: Chinese Americans have made enormous contributions to American society.
Caption: Historical photograph of Chinese laborers working on the Transcontinental Railroad in the 19th century. Thousands of Chinese workers risked their lives blasting tunnels and laying tracks through the Sierra Nevada mountains to build this "iron artery" that transformed America's destiny.
Geisel Library Exhibit Sheds Light on Chinese Workers Who Built Transcontinental Railway
In the 19th century, thousands of Chinese laborers risked their lives blasting tunnels and laying tracks through the Sierra Nevada mountains to build the Transcontinental Railroad. Without Chinese laborers, there would have been no "iron artery" that transformed America's destiny.
Caption: Chinese American Nobel laureate in Physics, Daniel Chee Tsui. Since the 20th century, Chinese American scientists have won honors across physics, medicine, and computer science, making indelible contributions to American scientific progress.
Chinese-American scientist Daniel Chee Tsui won Nobel Prize in Physics | Today in History | Fun Fact | Our China Story
Since the 20th century, Chinese American scientists have won honors in physics, medicine, computer science, and beyond. From Nobel laureate Daniel Tsui to entrepreneurs driving the tech revolution in Silicon Valley, to medical workers on the front lines of the pandemic—Chinese Americans have never been absent.
Today, Chinese Americans run countless small businesses, pay billions of dollars in taxes, raise the next generation of American citizens, and serve in the U.S. military in uniform.
Their passports say "United States of America." Their loyalty should not be questioned simply because of an East Asian face.
VI. A Rational Perspective: Don't Let a Few Bad Apples Spoil the Bunch
Of course, we must be honest.
There are indeed bad actors within the Chinese community. Some have falsified academic credentials, some have worked illegally, some have exploited legal loopholes. These behaviors not only damage the image of the Chinese community but also harm the interests of law-abiding Chinese immigrants.
But every group has its bad apples.
In American history, Irish immigrants were labeled "drunken and violent," Italian immigrants were stigmatized as "mafia," and Jewish immigrants faced systemic exclusion. Today, these groups have long since integrated into mainstream American society and become indispensable parts of the nation.
We cannot slap a label of "disloyalty" on an entire ethnicity because of the misconduct of a few individuals.
Just as we would not deny all men because some men are criminals, or deny all white people because of white supremacists—we should not deny the citizenship and loyalty of all Chinese Americans because some Chinese individuals have broken the law.
VII. This Is Not Just a Chinese American Issue
If Crossland's remarks ever became policy, the victims would not stop at Chinese Americans.
During World War II, it wasn't only Japanese Americans who were sent to internment camps—Koreans, Chinese, and even some Southeast Asians with "Oriental faces" were also implicated and discriminated against. Those who enforce policies based on appearance cannot tell whether you are Chinese, Japanese, Korean, or Vietnamese.
Today they incite anti-Chinese sentiment; who knows which group they will target tomorrow?
Approximately one-fifth of American adults still believe that Chinese Americans pose a potential threat to U.S. national security. This figure alone means that having an "East Asian face" remains an original sin in American society.
The concept of the "Perpetual Foreigner" is a classic theme in Asian American studies: no matter how many generations your family has lived in America, no matter how fluent your English, no matter how valid your passport—an East Asian face makes you "look un-American."
Caption: Demonstrators wave American flags at a "Stop Asian Hate" protest. If Crossland's remarks were ever implemented, Korean Americans, Japanese Americans, Southeast Asian Americans, and all who bear an "East Asian face" would be implicated.
VIII. In Closing
It's 2026. The era of AI, globalization, and information explosion.
And yet here we are, debating whether to put an entire ethnic group into concentration camps—on a podcast with 2.7 million subscribers, treated as a "worthwhile option for discussion."
This reminds me of what the three Congressmembers said in their statement:
"These remarks are dangerous and unacceptable. They have no place in our country, and we condemn them in the strongest possible terms."
As the Official Forum Host and Official Representative of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), I have always believed: Equality is not charity; it is the baseline of a civilized society. Gender equality is so, racial equality is so, and respect for every human being is even more so.
And I would like to add a few words as an individual.
I am Chinese, through and through, yet I have long considered New York my second home. On this land, I have encountered so many wonderful people—colleagues from around the world at the United Nations, fellow performers at the Times Square Earth Day Concert, artists sharing the stage with me at Lincoln Center and Carnegie Hall, including Grammy and Emmy Award winners; strangers who warmly greeted me during the St. Patrick's Day parade, congregants who smiled at me during church services, and even police officers and passersby who patiently gave me directions when I was lost. They come from every corner of the globe, with different skin colors and accents, yet all showed me the greatest kindness and inclusivity.
America is, after all, a nation of immigrants. Many of the so-called "pure foreigners" I met also carry their own homelands and stories with them. That is precisely why, when I see people having their loyalty questioned because of their bloodline, being treated as "potential enemies" because of their faces, what I feel is not only anger, but deep sorrow and bewilderment—how can a country that once embraced me with such warmth, more than a century later, be debating whether to round people up based on race again?
America is a nation of immigrants. Its greatness lies not in whom it excludes, but in whom it embraces.
Do not let the Chinese Exclusion Act of 144 years ago return in a new face in 2026.
Caption: At an Asian American protest, demonstrators hold a sign reading "We Belong Here." Regardless of ancestry or appearance, every person deserves to be treated equally.
Some images in this article are sourced from the internet for illustrative purposes only.
About the Author
Caption: The author, Prince John (Wang Guoquan), at the UN Commission on the Status of Women celebration fashion show.
Wang Guoquan (Prince John), international host and singer. Honored with the official certificate of "Prince of Love Songs · International Host" by the New York State Senate and the New York City Council. Official Forum Host and Official Representative of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW). Has performed alongside Emmy and Grammy Award winners, and has been invited to serve as host and performing guest at world-class cultural institutions and top universities including Lincoln Center, Carnegie Hall, New York City Hall, Columbia University, and Yale University. In April 2026, attended the 56th World Earth Day Times Square Concert as a distinguished guest.
end
网易新闻
常见释义
recliner - 百度翻译
躺椅
英[rɪˈklaɪnə(r)]
美[rɪˈklaɪnər]
释义
n.
例句
The leg section of the recliner is opened.
这把躺椅的椅腿部分已打开。
复数
LE PRIX DE LA VIE HUMAINE
druégrsfmrosugfeeadseéaeiiràcseeeclecsséesnaattarunsinirçnbeochrsépac,linerrocàeheteiaaéesocs,qantnlteinousràdpétepgeieiséuetajtrtdsétrstéedlrrésumaiadrtaeàuesidaesinrucacdedrer-ipptgrordeéfp'p
Francestratégie
recliner - 百度百科
（英语单词，音标英[rɪˈklaɪnə(r)]、美[rɪˈklaɪnər]）指可调节靠背角度的活动躺椅，亦指斜靠或躺卧的人，复数形式为recliners。作为家具术语，其核心定义为配有机械装置或按钮的扶手椅，常见于家居、医疗康复或交通工具等场景，并衍生出功能沙发、按摩椅等类型。该词涵盖的躺椅通常具有可倾斜靠背及脚踏设计，材质包括皮革、布艺等，功能上可结合躺床、沙滩椅等用途，部分产品支持电动调节或惯性锁装置。柯林斯词典将其归为“靠背角度可调的扶手椅”，近义词包括lounger、reclining chair等。其设计起源可追溯至19世纪的可调节座椅，早期形态侧重机械结构改良。随着技术进步，逐渐发展出电动控制、内置按摩等复合功能，并扩展至家庭影院、汽车座椅等现代应用场景。
单词释义
发展历程
应用
单词用法
百度百科
大家还在搜
洛手伤害计算器网页版
包贝尔因出轨风波新剧被除名
王俊杰喊杨瀚森“大爹”
西藏泥石流灾害原因现已查明
恩佐千字长文致敬梅西
中国男篮险胜黎巴嫩男篮
日本经济数据全面超预期
男子扫墓发现家族祖坟被破坏
百度APP内打开
- Centro per la Valutazione dell'Efficacia dell...
(215 milioni); le associazioni olmesartan+idrocloroti...anticolinergici antistaminici antagonisti dei recettori leucotrienici broncodilatatori - beta 2 agonisti broncodilatatori - teofillinici antiinfiammat...
www.aifa.gov.it
recliner是什么意思_recliner的翻译_音标... - 爱词霸
英[rɪˈklaɪnə(r)] 美[rɪˈklaɪnɚ] 释义 n. 斜躺者,可躺式椅 词态变化 复数: recliners ; 实用场景例句 全部 He settled comfortably into the soft...
金山词霸
recliner是什么意思_recliner的翻译_音标_用法...
recliner 英[rɪˈklaɪnə(r)] 美[rɪˈklaɪnɚ] n. 斜躺者,可躺式椅 单词变形 复数: recliners 中文词源 recliner 躺椅 ...
www.7ub.cn
热门跟贴