杨某媛被作为正面案例编入教材，立场先行的教材，该怎么纠错？|大学生|杨某媛|法院|翻译

前段时间，武大的杨某媛去西班牙留学还被网友追着举报，没想到在一本大学的教材里，杨某媛却成了正面人物了。这本书的书名是《大学生心理健康教育》，上海交通大学出版社，出版时间是2024年。
A while ago, Ms. Yang from Wuhan University was still being reported by netizens even after she went to study in Spain. Surprisingly, she is presented as a positive figure in a university textbook. The book is Mental Health Education for College Students, published by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press in 2024.

当然，2024年的时候，法院的判决还没有出来，等到2025年判决才出来，可在法院都没有定性之前，就急吼吼地把这件事写进教材，是不是有点草率。
Of course, the court ruling had not yet been issued back in 2024; the judgment only came out in 2025. But before the court reached any formal verdict, the publishers rushed to include this incident in the textbook. Wasn’t that rather hasty?
而现在，法院都判决了肖同学就是湿疹挠痒痒，不存在性骚扰，这本教材还能当作大学生的教材？
Now that the court has handed down its ruling confirming that Mr. Xiao was simply scratching an eczema rash and that no sexual harassment took place, can this textbook still be used for college students?
因为教材在学生心中的权威性，让学生很难去怀疑真实性，这样就能在潜移默化中改变很多人的认识。
Textbooks carry great authority in students’ minds, and students rarely question their authenticity. This can subtly shape many people’s perceptions.
杨某媛甚至都可以在西班牙用这个教材跟学校解释，看吧，都上了教材了，那些老外会知道这是诬告吗？
Ms. Yang could even show this textbook to her university in Spain and say, “Look, this is in a textbook.” Would those overseas institutions know that this was a false accusation?
所以到底是教材权威还是法院判决更权威？
So which carries greater authority: the textbook, or the court judgment?
编教材的人虽然卡着判决没有出来之前就把一件存在严重争议的事白纸黑字写进教材。完全是自己立场先行。
The textbook editors rushed to put this highly controversial incident into print before any ruling, clearly letting their stance come first.
就这态度，这水平，去编写大学生教材，这不是去毒害大学生吗？这本来就是严重的不负责。
With this attitude and standard, how can they be trusted to compile textbooks for university students? Isn’t this misleading college students? This is deeply irresponsible.
如今事态反转，法院已经还原清白，这白纸黑字的教材如何还人家清白？
Now that the facts have been clarified by the court, how can this printed textbook clear Mr. Xiao’s name?
这对肖同学又是一种伤害，或许只有肖同学去起诉这个出版社才能让他们改正。
It is another form of harm to him. Perhaps the only way to get the publisher to correct this is for Mr. Xiao to file a lawsuit against them.
是不是应该追责这几个编辑，把发出去的教材召回，销毁。并在下一版道歉并改正过来。
Should the editors be held accountable? Should all distributed copies of the textbook be recalled and destroyed? And should the publishers issue an apology and revise the content in the next edition?