内容简介

本综述论文从仿生设计和先进制造等方面对流体驱动人工肌肉进行总结,并讨论目前面临的挑战和未来发展趋势。我们长期以来一直致力于开发可以替代生物肌肉来完成各种任务的人工肌肉。柔性材料和3D打印技术的最新进展极大地推动了人工肌肉技术的发展。人们已经开发了由不同的外部刺激驱动的各种基于柔性材料的人工肌肉,包括压力、电压、光、磁、温度等。其中,流体驱动的人工肌肉(FAM)可以将流体(气体或液体)的动力转换成柔性材料的力和位移输出。由于它们简单、安全性高、驱动力大、能效高且成本低,是工业机器人、医疗器械和人工辅助装置中最广泛使用的驱动方法。本文介绍了FAM的生物设计、制造、传感、控制和应用,包括传统的气动/液压人工肌肉和由功能流体驱动的几种创新型人工肌肉。此外,文中还讨论了FAM的挑战和未来发展方向。

Zhang C, Zhu P, Lin Y, et al., 2021. Fluid-driven artificial muscles: bio-design, manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications. Bio-des Manuf 4(1):123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00099-z

文章导读

图1 线性FAM

图2 弯曲FAM

图3 扭转FAM

图4 FAM的不同应用领域

参考文献

上下滑动以阅览

1. Madden JDW, Vandesteeg NA, Anquetil PA, Madden PGA, Takshi A, Pytel RZ, Lafontaine SR, Wieringa PA, Hunter IW (2004) Artificial muscle technology: physical principles and naval prospects. IEEE J Ocean Eng 29:706–728. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2004.833135

2. Mirvakili SM, Hunter IW (2018) Artificial muscles: mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Adv Mater 30:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704407

3. Fan Z, Raun K, Hein L, Kiil HE (2008) Application of artificial muscles as actuators in engineering design. In: Yan XT, Jiang C, Eynard B (eds) Advanced design and manufacture to gain a competitive edge. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-241-8_88

4. Park N, Kim J (2020) Hydrogel-based artificial muscles: overview and recent progress. Adv Intell Syst 2:1900135. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.201900135

5. Wang H, Qu S (2016) Constitutive models of artificial muscles: a review. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 17:22–36. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1500207

6. Zhang J, Sheng J, Ciaran TO, Walsh CJ, Wood RJ, Ryu J, Desai JP, Yip MC (2016) Robotic artificial muscles: current progress and future perspectives for biomimetic actuators. IEEE Trans Robot 35:761–781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2019.2894371

7. Zhang Z, Philen M (2012) Pressurized artificial muscles. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 23:255–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X11420592

8. Polygerinos P, Correll N, Morin SA, Mosadegh B, Onal CD, Petersen K, Cianchetti M, Tolley MT, Shepherd RF (2017) Soft robotics: review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications in human-robot interaction. Adv Eng Mater 19:1700016. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700016

9. Abrar T, Putzu F, Konstantinova J, Althoefer K (2019) EPAM: eversive pneumatic artificial muscle. In: RoboSoft 2019 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics, pp 19–24

10. Sangian D, Foroughi J, Farajikhah S, Naficy S, Spinks GM (2017) A bladder-free, non-fluidic, conductive McKibben artificial muscle operated electro-thermally. Smart Mater Struct 26:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/26/1/015011

11. Zhang JJ, Yin YH, Zhu JY (2013) Electrical resistivity-based study of self-sensing properties for shape memory alloy-actuated artificial muscle. Sensors (Switzerland) 13:12958–12974. https://doi.org/10.3390/s131012958

12. Kim YS, Liu M, Ishida Y, Ebina Y, Osada M, Sasaki T, Hikima T, Takata M, Aida T (2015) Thermoresponsive actuation enabled by permittivity switching in an electrostatically anisotropic hydrogel. Nat Mater 14:1002–1007. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4363

13. Zhang X, Pint CL, Lee MH, Schubert BE, Jamshidi A, Takei K, Ko H, Gillies A, Bardhan R, Urban JJ, Wu M, Fearing R, Javey A (2011) Optically- and thermally-responsive programmable materials based on carbon nanotube-hydrogel polymer composites. Nano Lett 11:3239–3244. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201503e

14. Wang E, Desai MS, Lee SW (2013) Light-controlled graphene-elastin composite hydrogel actuators. Nano Lett 13:2826–2830. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401088b

15. Taniguchi H, Miyake M, Suzumori K (2010) Development of new soft actuator using magnetic intelligent fluids for flexible walking robot. In: ICCAS 2010—international conference on control, automation and systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2010.5669801

16. Hosoda M, Nishimoto Y, Nashima S (2007) Magnetic-field-driven artificial muscle based on the H. Huxley model: fundamental experiments. Jpn J Appl Phys 46:2–5. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.L170

17. Ventura E, Oztan C, Palacios D, Isabel Vargas I, Celik E (2020) Magnetically-doped polydimethylsiloxane for artificial muscle applications. Funct Mater Lett 13:50–53. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793604719500899

18. Qiu Y, Zhang E, Plamthottam R, Pei Q (2019) Dielectric elastomer artificial muscle: materials innovations and device explorations. Acc Chem Res 52:316–325. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00516

19. Ma S, Zhang Y, Liang Y, Ren L, Tian W, Ren L (2020) High-performance ionic-polymer–metal composite: toward large-deformation fast-response artificial muscles. Adv Funct Mater 30:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201908508

20. Jager EWH, Inganäs O, Lundström I (2000) Microrobots for micrometer-size objects in aqueous media: Potential tools for single-cell manipulation. Science 288:2335–2338. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5475.2335

21. Zhang Z, Wang X, Tan S, Wang Q (2019) Superior electrostrictive strain achieved under low electric fields in relaxor ferroelectric polymers. J Mater Chem A 7:5201–5208. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta11938d

22. Kim S, Hawkes E, Cho K, Jolda M, Foley J, Wood R (2009) Micro artificial muscle fiber using NiTi spring for soft robotics. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems IROS 2009, pp 2228–2234. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354178

23. Ishihara M, Sato H, Tateishi H, Kawagoe T, Shimatani Y, Kurisu S, Sakai K (1995) Intraaortic balloon pumping as adjunctive therapy to rescue coronary angioplasty after failed thrombolysis in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 76:73–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80805-4

24. Lopes V, Steffen V, Savi MA (2016) Dynamics of smart systems and structures: concepts and applications. Springer, London

25. Koh JS, Cho KJ (2013) Omega-shaped inchworm-inspired crawling robot with large-index-and-pitch (LIP) SMA spring actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech 18:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2012.2211033

26. Miková L, Medvecká-Beňová S, Kelemen M, Trebuňa F, Virgala I (2015) Application of shape memory alloy (SMA) as actuator. Metalurgija 54:169–172

27. Rodrigue H, Wang W, Han MW, Kim TJY, Ahn SH (2017) An overview of shape memory alloy-coupled actuators and robots. Soft Robot 4:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2016.0008

28. Bar-Cohen Y (2002) Electroactive polymers as artificial muscles: a review. J Spacecr Rockets 39:822–827. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3902

29. Bar-cohen Y, Anderson IA (2019) Electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators-background review. Mech Soft Mater 1(5):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42558-019-0005-1

30. Gu G, Zou J, Zhao R, Zhao X, Zhu X (2018) Soft wall-climbing robots. Sci Robot 2874:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat2874

31. Li T, Li G, Liang Y, Cheng T, Dai J, Yang X, Liu B, Zeng Z, Huang Z, Luo Y, Xie T, Yang W (2017) Fast-moving soft electronic fish. Sci Adv 3:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602045

32. Ji X, Liu X, Cacucciolo V, Imboden M, Civet Y, El-Haitami A, Cantin S, Perriard Y, Shea H (2019) An autonomous untethered fast soft robotic insect driven by low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. Sci Robot 4:eaaz6451. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaz6451

33. Hajiesmaili E, Clarke DR (2019) Reconfigurable shape-morphing dielectric elastomers using spatially varying electric fields. Nat Commun 10:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08094-w

34. Chen Z, Um TI, Bart-Smith H (2011) A novel fabrication of ionic polymer-metal composite membrane actuator capable of 3-dimensional kinematic motions. Sens Actuators A Phys 168:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.02.034

35. Yang D, Kong X, Ni Y, Ren Z, Li S, Nie J, Chen X, Zhang L (2019) Ionic polymer-metal composites actuator driven by the pulse current signal of triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 66:104139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104139

36. Chen Z, Um TI, Bart-Smith H (2012) Bio-inspired robotic manta ray powered by ionic polymer-metal composite artificial muscles. Int J Smart Nano Mater 3:296–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2012.686458

37. Haines CS, Lima MD, Li N, Spinks GM, Foroughi J, Madden JDW, Kim SH, Fang S, De Andrade MJ, Göktepe F, Göktepe Ö, Mirvakili SM, Naficy S, Lepró X, Oh J, Kozlov ME, Kim SJ, Xu X, Swedlove BJ, Wallace GG, Baughman RH (2014) Artificial muscles from fishing line and sewing thread. Science 343:868–872. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246906

38. Haines CS, Li N, Spinks GM, Aliev AE, Di J, Baughman RH (2016) New twist on artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:11709–11716. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605273113

39. Maziz A, Concas A, Khaldi A, Stålhand J, Persson NK, Jager EWH (2017) Knitting and weaving artificial muscles. Sci Adv 3:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600327

40. Kanik M, Orguc S, Varnavides G, Kim J (2019) Strain-programmable fiber-based artificial muscle. Science 150:145–150. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2502

41. Li S, Vogt DM, Rus D, Wood RJ (2017) Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:13132–13137. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713450114

42. Aziz S, Spinks GM (2020) Torsional artificial muscles. Mater Horiz 7:667–693. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9MH01441A

43. Mirvakili SM, Hunter IW (2018) Artificial muscles: mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Adv Mater 30:1704407. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704407

44. Ariano P, Accardo D, Lombardi M et al (2015) Polymeric materials as artificial muscles: an overview. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000184

45. Mirfakhrai T, Madden JDW, Baughman RH (2007) Polymer artificial muscles. Mater Today 10:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70048-2

46. Bar-Cohen Y (2007) Artificial muscles based on electroactive polymers as an enabling tool in biomimetics. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 221:1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES510

47. Kang HW, Lee IH, Cho DW (2006) Development of a micro-bellows actuator using micro-stereolithography technology. Microelectron Eng 83:1201–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.228

48. Baldwin HA (1969) Realizable models of muscle function. Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6558-1_14

49. Yokota S, Yajima F, Takemura K, Edamura K (2010) Electro-conjugate fluid jet-driven micro artificial antagonistic muscle actuators and their integration. Adv Robot 24:1929–1943. https://doi.org/10.1163/016918610X529048

50. Yamaguchi A, Takemura K, Yokota S, Edamura K (2011) An in-pipe mobile robot using electro-conjugate fluid. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 5:214–226. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.5.214

51. Mirvakili SM, Sim D, Hunter IW, Langer R (2020) Actuation of untethered pneumatic artificial muscles and soft robots using magnetically induced liquid-to-gas phase transitions. Sci Robot 4239:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaz4239

52. Sanan S, Lynn PS, Griffith ST (2014) Pneumatic torsional actuators for inflatable robots. J Mech Robot 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026629

53. Veale AJ, Xie SQ, Anderson IA (2016) Characterizing the Peano fluidic muscle and the effects of its geometry properties on its behavior. Smart Mater Struct 25:065013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/6/065013

54. Kellaris N, Venkata VG, Smith GM, Mitchell SK, Keplinger C (2018) Peano-HASEL actuators: muscle-mimetic, electrohydraulic transducers that linearly contract on activation. Sci Robot 3:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aar3276

55. Hiramitsu T, Wada A, Suzumori K, Nabae H, Endo G (2017) Hose-free pneumatic bags-muscle driven by gas/liquid conversion. In: SII 2016—2016 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration, pp 616–621. https://doi.org/10.1109/SII.2016.7844067

56. Daerden F, Lefeber D (2001) The concept and design of pleated pneumatic artificial muscles. Int J Fluid Power 2:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2001.10781119

57. Daerden F, Lefeber D, Verrelst B, Van Ham R (2001) Pleated pneumatic artificial muscles: compliant robotic actuators. IEEE Int Conf Intell Robot Syst 4:1958–1963. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2001.976360

58. Zhuo S, Zhao Z, Xie Z, Hao Y, Xu Y, Zhao T, Li H, Knubben EM, Wen L, Jiang L, Liu M (2020) Complex multiphase organohydrogels with programmable mechanics toward adaptive soft-matter machines. Sci Adv 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax1464

59. Joshi A, Kulkarni A, Tadesse Y (2019) FludoJelly: Experimental study on jellyfish-like soft robot enabled by soft pneumatic composite (SPC). Robotics 8:56. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics8030056

60. Frame J, Lopez N, Curet O, Engeberg ED (2018) Thrust force characterization of free-swimming soft robotic jellyfish. Bioinspir Biomim 13:064001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aadcb3

61. Suzumori K, Iikura S, Tanaka H (1992) Applying a flexible microactuator to robotic mechanisms. IEEE Control Syst Mag 12:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.120448

62. Yamaguchi A, Takemura K, Yokota S, Edamura K (2011) A robot hand using electro-conjugate fluid: Imitating a palm motion of human hand using soft balloon actuator. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, ROBIO 2011, pp 1807–1812. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2011.6181552

63. Yamaguchi A, Takemura K, Yokota S, Edamura K (2012) A robot hand using electro-conjugate fluid: grasping experiment with balloon actuators inducing a palm motion of robot hand. Sens Actuators A Phys 174:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.11.036

64. Yamaguchi A, Takemura K, Yokota S, Edamura K (2011) A robot hand using electro-conjugate fluid. Sens Actuators A Phys 170:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.06.002

65. Mori K, Yamaguchi A, Takemura K, Yokota S, Edamura K (2012) Control of a novel flexible finger using electro-conjugate fluid with built-in angle sensor. Sens Actuators A Phys 183:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.04.028

66. Nagaoka T, Mao Z, Takemura K, Yokota S, Kim JW (2019) ECF (electro-conjugate fluid) finger with bidirectional motion and its application to a flexible hand. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aaf49a

67. Yamaguchi A, Takemura K, Yokota S, Edamura K (2012) Robot finger using electro-conjugate fluid. Adv Robot 26:861–876. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855312X632913

68. Abe R, Takemura K, Edamura K, Yokota S (2007) Concept of a micro finger using electro-conjugate fluid and fabrication of a large model prototype. Sens Actuators A Phys 136:629–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.10.046

69. Miyoshi T, Yoshida K, Kim JW, Eom SI, Yokota S (2016) An MEMS-based multiple electro-rheological bending actuator system with an alternating pressure source. Sens Actuators A Phys 245:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2016.04.041

70. Han J, Jiang W, Niu D, Li Y, Zhang Y, Lei B, Liu H, Shi Y, Chen B, Yin L, Liu X, Peng D, Lu B (2019) Untethered soft actuators by liquid-vapor phase transition: remote and programmable actuation. Adv Intell Syst 1:1900109. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.201900109

71. Shepherd RF, Ilievski F, Choi W, Morin SA, Stokes AA, Mazzeo AD, Chen X, Wang M, Whitesides GM (2011) Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20400–20403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116564108

72. Zhang M, Li G, Yang X, Xiao Y, Yang T, Wong TW, Li T (2018) Artificial muscle driven soft hydraulic robot: electromechanical actuation and simplified modeling. Smart Mater Struct 27:095016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aacfe3

73. Cacucciolo V, Shintake J, Kuwajima Y, Maeda S, Floreano D, Shea H (2019) Stretchable pumps for soft machines. Nature 572:516–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1479-6

74. Sudhawiyangkul T, Yoshida K, Eom SI, wan Kim J (2020) A study on a hybrid structure flexible electro-rheological microvalve for soft microactuators. Microsyst Technol 26:309–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-019-04492-2

75. Wakimoto S, Ogura K, Suzumori K, Nishioka Y (2009) Miniature soft hand with curling rubber pneumatic actuators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 556–561. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152259

76. Deimel R, Brock O (2013) A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 2047–2053. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630851

77. Polygerinos P, Wang Z, Galloway KC, Wood RJ, Walsh CJ (2015) Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robot Auton Syst 73:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014

78. Onal CD, Rus D (2012) A modular approach to soft robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE RAS EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, pp 1038–1045. https://doi.org/10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290290

79. Guan Q, Sun J, Liu Y, Wereley NM, Leng J (2020) Novel bending and helical extensile/contractile pneumatic artificial muscles inspired by elephant trunk. Soft Robot 00:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2019.0079

80. Schaffner M, Faber JA, Pianegonda L, Rühs PA, Coulter F, Studart AR (2018) 3D printing of robotic soft actuators with programmable bioinspired architectures. Nat Commun 9:878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03216-w

81. Connolly F, Polygerinos P, Walsh CJ, Bertoldi K (2015) Mechanical programming of soft actuators by varying fiber angle. Soft Robot 2:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2015.0001

82. Martinez RV, Fish CR, Chen X, Whitesides GM (2012) Elastomeric origami: programmable paper-elastomer composites as pneumatic actuators. Adv Funct Mater 22:1376–1384. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201102978

83. Yang D, Mosadegh B, Ainla A, Lee B, Khashai F, Suo Z, Bertoldi K, Whitesides GM (2015) Buckling of elastomeric beams enables actuation of soft machines. Adv Mater 27:6323–6327. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503188

84. Gorissen B, Chishiro T, Shimomura S, Reynaerts D, De Volder M, Konishi S (2014) Flexible pneumatic twisting actuators and their application to tilting micromirrors. Sens Actuators A Phys 216:426–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2014.01.015

85. Jiao Z, Zhang C, Wang W, Pan M, Yang H, Zou J (2019) Advanced artificial muscle for flexible material-based reconfigurable soft robots. Adv Sci 1901371:1901371. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201901371

86. Lee JY, Kim WB, Choi WY, Cho KJ (2016) Soft robotic blocks: introducing SoBL, a fast-build modularized design block. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 23:30–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2580479

87. Handorf AM, Zhou Y, Halanski MA, Li WJ (2015) Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis 11:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476278.2015.1019687

88. Rus D, Tolley MT (2015) Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14543

89. Engineering ToolBox (2003) Young's modulus—tensile and yield strength for common materials. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/young-modulus-d_417.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2020

90. Tolley MT, Shepherd RF, Mosadegh B, Galloway KC, Wehner M, Karpelson M, Wood RJ, Whitesides GM (2014) A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robot 1:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.0008

91. Abdulrab HQA, Mohd Nordin INA, Muhammad Razif MR, Mohd Faudzi AA (2018) Snake-like soft robot using 2-chambers actuator. Elektr J Electr Eng 17:34–40. https://doi.org/10.11113/elektrika.v17n1.39

92. Marchese AD, Katzschmann RK, Rus D (2015) A recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots. Soft Robot 2:7–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.0022

93. Katzschmann RK, Thieffry M, Goury O, Kruszewski A, Guerra TM, Duriez C, Rus D (2019) Dynamically closed-loop controlled soft robotic arm using a reduced order finite element model with state observer. In: RoboSoft 2019—2019 IEEE international conference on soft robotics, pp 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722804

94. Katzschmann RK, Marchese AD, Rus D (2016) Hydraulic autonomous soft robotic fish for 3D swimming. In: Hsieh M, Khatib O, Kumar V (eds) Experimental robotics. Springer tracts in advanced robotics, vol 109. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23778-7_27

95. Wehner M, Truby RL, Fitzgerald DJ, Mosadegh B, Whitesides GM, Lewis JA, Wood RJ (2016) An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536:451–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19100

96. Martinez RV, Branch JL, Fish CR, Jin L, Shepherd RF, Nunes RMD, Suo Z, Whitesides GM (2013) Robotic tentacles with three-dimensional mobility based on flexible elastomers. Adv Mater 25:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201203002

97. Park YL, Chau K, Black RJ, Cutkosky MR (2007) Force sensing robot fingers using embedded fiber Bragg grating sensors and shape deposition manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 1510–1516. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363538

98. Cham JG, Bailey SA, Clark JE, Full RJ, Cutkosky MR (2002) Fast and robust: hexapedal robots via shape deposition manufacturing. Int J Robot Res 21:869–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364902021010837

99. McClung AJ, Cutkosky MR, Cham JG (2004) Rapid maneuvering of a biologically inspired hexapedal robot. In: American society of mechanical engineers, dynamic systems and control division (publication) DSC, pp 1195–1202. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2004-61150

100. Cho KJ, Koh JS, Kim S, Chu WS, Hong Y, Ahn SH (2009) Review of manufacturing processes for soft biomimetic robots. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 10:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-009-0064-6

101. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos B Eng 143:172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

102. Zhou L, Fu J, He Y (2020) A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater 2000187:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000187

103. Gul JZ, Sajid M, Rehman MM, Siddiqui GU, Shah I, Kim KH, Lee JW, Choi KH (2018) 3D printing for soft robotics—a review. Sci Technol Adv Mater 19:243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2018.1431862

104. Wallin TJ, Pikul J, Shepherd RF (2018) 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat Rev Mater 3:84–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0002-2

105. Yap HK, Ng HY, Yeow CH (2016) High-force soft printable pneumatics for soft robotic applications. Soft Robot 3:144–158. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2016.0030

106. Miriyev A, Stack K, Lipson H (2017) Soft material for soft actuators. Nat Commun 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00685-3

107. Trimmer B, Lewis JA, Shepherd RF, Lipson H (2015) 3D printing soft materials: what is possible? Soft Robot 2:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2015.1502

108. Hamidi A, Tadesse Y (2020) 3D printing of very soft elastomer and sacrificial carbohydrate glass/elastomer structures for robotic applications. Mater Des 187:108324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108324

109. Lewis JA (2006) Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv Funct Mater 16:2193–2204. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600434

110. Robinson SS, O’Brien KW, Zhao H, Peele BN, Larson CM, Mac Murray BC, Van Meerbeek IM, Dunham SN, Shepherd RF (2015) Integrated soft sensors and elastomeric actuators for tactile machines with kinesthetic sense. Extreme Mech Lett 5:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2015.09.005

111. Fu K, Wang Y, Yan C, Yao Y, Chen Y, Dai J, Lacey S, Wang Y, Wan J, Li T, Wang Z, Xu Y, Hu L (2016) Graphene oxide-based electrode inks for 3D-printed lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 28:2587–2594. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201505391

112. Rost A, Schädle S (2013) The SLS-generated soft robotic hand—an integrated approach using additive manufacturing and reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the—2013 12th international conference on machine learning and applications ICMLA 2013, vol 1, pp 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2013.44

113. Cianchetti M, Menciassi A (2017) Soft robotics: trends, applications and challenges. Biosyst Biorobot 17:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46460-2

114. Peele BN, Wallin TJ, Zhao H, Shepherd RF (2015) 3D printing antagonistic systems of artificial muscle using projection stereolithography. Bioinspir Biomim 10:055003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/10/5/055003

115. Patel DK, Sakhaei AH, Layani M, Zhang B, Ge Q, Magdassi S (2017) Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv Mater 29:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606000

116. Bartlett NW, Tolley MT, Overvelde JTB, Weaver JC, Mosadegh B, Bertoldi K, Whitesides GM, Wood RJ (2015) A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science 349:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0129

117. Truby RL, Wehner M, Grosskopf AK, Vogt DM, Uzel SGM, Wood RJ, Lewis JA (2018) Soft somatosensitive actuators via embedded 3D printing. Adv Mater 30:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706383

118. Drotman D, Jadhav S, Karimi M, Dezonia P, Tolley MT (2017) 3D printed soft actuators for a legged robot capable of navigating unstructured terrain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 5532–5538. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989652

119. Han D, Gu H, van Kim J, Yokota S (2017) A bio-inspired 3D-printed hybrid finger with integrated ECF (electro-conjugate fluid) micropumps. Sens Actuators A Phys 257:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.02.002

120. Kato T, Higashi T (2010) Teleoperation of a robot arm system using pneumatic artificial rubber muscles teleoperation over the internet using UDP and a web camera. In: 2010 international conference on broadband, wireless computing, communication and applications, pp 714–718. https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2010.160

121. Skorina EH, Tao W, Chen F, Luo M, Onal CD (2016) Motion control of a soft-actuated modular manipulator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation 2016, pp 4997–5002. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487706

122. Katzschmann RK, DelPreto J, MacCurdy R, Rus D (2018) Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci Robot 3:eaar3449. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aar3449

123. Onal CD, Rus D (2013) Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot. Bioinspir Biomim 8:026003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/8/2/026003

124. Robertson MA, Dejace L, Lacour SP, Paik J (2019) Bi-modal control of vacuum-powered soft pneumatic actuators with embedded liquid metal-based strain sensitive skin. In: RoboSoft 2019 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics, pp 217–221.https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722810

125. Yamamoto Y, Wakimoto S, Suzumori K (2011) Evaluation of electro conductive film and strain gage as displacement sensor for pneumatic artificial muscle. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, ROBIO 2011, pp 1206–1211. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2011.6181452

126. Truby RL, Della SC, Rus D (2020) Distributed proprioception of 3d configuration in soft, sensorized robots via deep learning. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5:3299–3306. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2976320

127. Petersen KH, Shepherd RF (2019) Fluid-driven intrinsically soft robots. Adv Mater Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102260-3.00004-4

28. Wang H, Totaro M, Beccai L (2018) Toward perceptive soft robots: progress and challenges. Adv Sci 5:1800541. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201800541

129. Wang C, Dong L, Peng D, Pan C (2019) Tactile sensors for advanced intelligent systems. Adv Intell Syst 1:1900090. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.201900090

130. Zhao H, O’Brien K, Li S, Shepherd RF (2016) Optoelectronically innervated soft prosthetic hand via stretchable optical waveguides. Sci Robot 1:7529. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aai7529

131. Dang W, Hosseini ES, Dahiya R (2018) Soft robotic finger with integrated stretchable strain sensor. Proc IEEE Sens 2018:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2018.8589671

132. Koivikko A, Raei ES, Sariola V, Mosallaei M, Mantysalo M (2017) Soft actuators with screen-printed curvature sensors. Proc IEEE Sens 2017:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2017.8234045

133. Kim T, Member S, Yoon SJ, Park Y (2018) Soft inflatable sensing modules for safe and interactive robots. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3:3216–3223. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2850971

134. Helps T, Rossiter J (2018) Proprioceptive flexible fluidic actuators using conductive working fluids. Soft Robot 5:175–189. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2017.0012

135. Tondu B (2012) Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: a review. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 23:225–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X11435435

136. Wu J, Huang J, Wang Y, Xing K (2014) Nonlinear disturbance observer-based dynamic surface control for trajectory tracking of pneumatic muscle system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 22:440–455. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2013.2262074

137. Merola A, Colacino D, Cosentino C, Amato F (2018) Model-based tracking control design, implementation of embedded digital controller and testing of a biomechatronic device for robotic rehabilitation. Mechatronics 52:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.04.006

138. Sun N, Di Liang WuY, Chen Y, Qin Y, Fang Y (2020) Adaptive control for pneumatic artificial muscle systems with parametric uncertainties and unidirectional input constraints. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 16:969–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2923715

139. Hocking EG, Wereley NM (2013) Analysis of nonlinear elastic behavior in miniature pneumatic artificial muscles. Smart Mater Struct 22:014016. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/014016

140. Webster RJ, Jones BA (2010) Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: a review. Int J Robot Res 29:1661–1683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364910368147

141. Gravagne IA, Rahn CD, Walker ID (2003) Large deflection dynamics and control for planar continuum robots. IEEE ASME Trans Mech 8:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2003.812829

142. Sadati SMH, Naghibi SE, Walker ID, Althoefer K, Nanayakkara T (2018) Control space reduction and real-time accurate modeling of continuum manipulators using Ritz and Ritz-Galerkin methods. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3:328–335. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2743100

143. Renda F, Boyer F, Dias J, Seneviratne L (2018) Discrete Cosserat approach for multisection soft manipulator dynamics. IEEE Trans Robot 34:1518–1533. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2018.2868815

144. VanGriethuijsen LI, Trimmer BA (2009) Kinematics of horizontal and vertical caterpillar crawling. J Exp Biol 212:1455–1462. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025783

145. Woods WA, Fusillo SJ, Trimmer BA (2008) Dynamic properties of a locomotory muscle of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta during strain cycling and simulated natural crawling. J Exp Biol 211:873–882. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.006031

146. Matzner H, Gutfreund Y, Hochner B (2000) Neuromuscular system of the flexible arm of the octopus: physiological characterization. J Neurophysiol 83:1315–1328. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.83.3.1315

147. Farrow N, Correll N (2015) A soft pneumatic actuator that can sense grasp and touch. IEEE Int Conf Intell Robot Syst 2015:2317–2323. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7353689

148. Marchese AD, Rus D (2016) Design, kinematics, and control of a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator. Int J Robot Res 35:840–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364915587925

149. Turkseven M, Ueda J (2016) Observer based impedance control of a pneumatic system with long transmission lines. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2016:1160–1165. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487245

150. Melingui A, Lakhal O, Daachi B, Mbede JB, Merzouki R (2015) Adaptive neural network control of a compact bionic handling arm. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech 20:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2015.2396114

151. Caldwell DG, Tsagarakis NG, Kousidou S, Costa N, Sarakoglou I (2007) “Soft” exoskeletons for upper and lower body rehabilitation—design, control and testing. Int J Humanoid Robot 4:549–573. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843607001151

152. Gordon KE, Sawicki GS, Ferris DP (2006) Mechanical performance of artificial pneumatic muscles to power an ankle-foot orthosis. J Biomech 39:1832–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.018

153. Ferris DP, Gordon KE, Sawicki GS, Peethambaran A (2006) An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. Gait Posture 23:425–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.05.004

154. Ferris DP, Czerniecki JM, Hannaford B (2005) An ankle-foot orthosis powered by artificial pneumatic muscles. J Appl Biomech 21:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.21.2.189

155. Gupta A, O’Malley MK (2006) Design of a haptic arm exoskeleton for training and rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 11:280–289. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2006.875558

156. Nuchkrua T, Leephakpreeda T, Mekarporn T (2013) Development of robot hand with Pneumatic Artificial Muscle for rehabilitation application. In: IEEE international conference on nano/molecular medicine and engineering NANOMED, pp 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/NANOMED.2013.6766315

157. Mccarthy G, Effraimidis D, Jennings B, Corso N, Onal CD, Popovic M (2014) Hydraulically actuated muscle (HAM) exo-musculature. In: Robot makers: the future of digital rapid design and fabrication of robots", (RoMa) workshop the 2014 robotics: science and systems conference (RSS), July 2014.

158. Kawashima K, Sasaki T, Miyata T, Nakamura N, Sekiguchi M, Kagawa T (2004) Development of robot using pneumatic artificial rubber muscles to operate construction machinery. J Robot Mechatron 16:8–16. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2004.p0008

159. Van Damme M, Van Ham R, Vanderborght B, Daerden F, Lefeber D (2006) Design of a “soft” 2-DOF planar pneumatic manipulator. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on climbing and walking robots and support technologies for mobile machines CLAWAR 2005, pp 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26415-9-67

160. Van Damme M, Daerden F, Lefeber D (2005) A pneumatic manipulator used in direct contact with an operator. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2005:4494–4499. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570812

161. Ichim I (2007) Pneumatic applied to logistic systems. Ann Oradea Univ Fascicle Manag Technol Eng 6:2282–2289

162. Mishra AK, Wallin TJ, Pan W, Xu P, Wang K, Giannelis EP, Mazzolai B, Shepherd RF (2020) Autonomic perspiration in 3D-printed hydrogel actuators. Sci Robot 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaz3918

163. Miron G, Bédard B, Plante JS (2018) Sleeved bending actuators for soft grippers: A durable solution for high force-to-weight applications. Actuators 7:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/act7030040

164. Harihara K, Dohta S, Akagi T, Zhang F (2010) Development of a search type rescue robot driven by pneumatic actuator. In: Proceedings of SICE annual conference 2010, Taipei, 2010, pp 1311–1317

165. Vasios N, Gross AJ, Soifer S, Overvelde JB, Bertoldi K (2020) Harnessing viscous flow to simplify the actuation of fluidic soft robots. Soft Robot 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2018.0149

166. Ozkan-Aydin Y, Murray-Cooper M, Aydin E, McCaskey EN, Naclerio N, Hawkes EW, Goldman DI (2019) Nutation AIDS heterogeneous substrate exploration in a robophysical root. In: RoboSoft 2019—2019 IEEE international conference on soft robotics, pp 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722717

167. Hawkes EW, Blumenschein LH, Greer JD, Okamura AM (2017) A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci Robot 2:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aan3028

168. Niiyama R, Kuniyoshi Y (2008). Pneumatic biped with an artificial musculoskeletal system. In: 4th international symposium on adaptive motion of animals and machines (AMAM2008)

169. Boblan I, Schulz A (2010) A humanoid muscle robot torso with biologically inspired construction. In: ISR 2010 (41st international symposium on robotics) and ROBOTIK 2010 (6th German conference on robotics), Munich, Germany, 2010, pp 1–6

170. Niiyama R, Nishikawa S, Kuniyoshi Y (2010) Athlete robot with applied human muscle activation patterns for bipedal running. In: 2010 10th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots 2010, pp 498–503. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2010.5686316

171. Kingsley DA, Quinn RD, Ritzmann RE (2006) A cockroach inspired robot with artificial muscles. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 1837–1842. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2006.282229

172. Kerscher T, Albiez J, Berns K (2002) Joint control of the six-legged robot AirBug driven by fluidic muscles. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on robot motion and control RoMoCo 2002, pp 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMOCO.2002.1177079

173. Zou J, Lin Y, Ji C, Yang H (2018) A reconfigurable omnidirectional soft robot based on caterpillar locomotion. Soft Robot 5:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2017.0008

174. Zhang B, Fan Y, Yang P, Cao T, Liao H (2019) Worm-like soft robot for complicated tubular environments. Soft Robot 6:399–413. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2018.0088

175. Liao B, Zang H, Chen M, Wang Y, Lang X, Zhu N, Yang Z, Yi Y (2020) Soft rod-climbing robot inspired by winding locomotion of snake. Soft Robot 00:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2019.0070

176. Marchese AD, Onal CD, Rus D (2014) Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot 1:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2013.0009

177. Brown G, Haggard R, Almassy R, Benney R, Dellicker S (1999) The affordable guided airdrop system (AGAS). In: 15th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, pp 316–325. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-1742

178. Pohl M (2005) A motion seat using pneumatic membrane actuators in a hexapod system structure. In: 6th international workshop on research and education in mechatronics, June 2005, Annecy, France

179. Bubert EA, Woods BKS, Lee K, Kothera CS, Wereley NM (2010) Design and fabrication of a passive 1D morphing aircraft skin. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 21:1699–1717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X10378777

关于本刊

Bio-Design and Manufacturing(中文名《生物设计与制造》),简称BDM,是浙江大学主办的专业英文季刊,主编杨华勇院士、崔占峰院士,2018年新创,目前已被SCI-E等检索,最新影响因子为6.302。

初审迅速:初审快速退稿,不影响作者投其它期刊。

审稿速度快:过去两年平均录用时间约40天;平均退稿时间约10天。文章录用后及时在线SpringerLink。一般两周左右即被SCI-E检索。

收稿方向:机械工程(3D打印及生物处理工程等)、生物墨水与配方、组织与器官工程、医学与诊断装置、生物产品设计等。

文章类型:Research Article, Review, Short Paper (包括Editorial, Perspective, Letter, Technical Note, Case Report, Lab Report等)。

期刊主页:

http://www.springer.com/journal/42242

http://www.jzus.zju.edu.cn/ (国内可下载全文)

在线投稿地址:
http://www.editorialmanager.com/bdmj/default.aspx

编辑:金程 校对:张彤

JME学院简介

JME学院是由《机械工程学报》编辑部2018年创建,以关注、陪伴青年学者成长为宗旨,努力探索学术传播服务新模式。首任院长是中国机械工程学会监事会监事长、《机械工程学报》中英文两刊主编宋天虎。

欢迎各位老师扫码添加小助理-暖暖为好友,由小助理拉入JME学院官方群!

寻觅合作伙伴

有一种合作叫做真诚,有一种发展可以无限,有一种伙伴可以互利共赢,愿我们合作起来流连忘返,发展起来前景可观。关于论文推荐、团队介绍、图书出版、学术直播、招聘信息、会议推广等,请与我们联系。

感谢关注我们!我们《机械工程学报》编辑部将努力为您打造一个有态度、有深度、有温度的学术媒体!

版权声明:

来源: 生物设计与制造BDM。

特别声明:本微信转载文章出于非商业性的教育和科研目的,如转载稿涉及版权等问题,请立即联系我们,我们会予以更改或删除相关文章,保证您的权益。

联系人:暖暖

电话:010-88379909

E-mail:jme@cmes.org

网 址:http://www.cjmenet.com.cn

官方微信号:jmewechat