少年学报消息，复旦大学副教授沈奕斐近日发视频称，因一场直播连麦，被家长举报至多个部门。
视频下，老师们或转发附言、或默默点赞，字里行间满是共鸣与无奈。
A controversy involving Shen Yifei, an associate professor at Fudan University, has sparked discussion in China over excessive parental complaints and growing pressure on teachers.
潮新闻梳理发现，事情的起因是，一位小学生家长通过直播连麦，向沈奕斐咨询孩子在学校里遭遇“校园霸凌”的事。
沈教授请她举几个最严重的例子，这位家长讲了两件事：一是，自家孩子给同学分零食，但同学有好吃的没分给他；二是两个孩子拌嘴，互相推搡了几下。随后，这位母亲因为这两件事，反复投诉、举报学校和老师，甚至还报了警。
The incident began after a parent joined Shen's livestream to discuss alleged "school bullying" involving her child. The parent cited two incidents: classmates not sharing snacks and children pushing each other during an argument.
沈教授分析：“这不是霸凌，而是家长陷入了极端的‘受害者逻辑’，把正常的儿童社交摩擦上纲上线。”
Shen said the incidents did not amount to bullying, but rather reflected an extreme "victim mentality" that turned normal childhood conflicts into serious accusations.
根据沈教授自述，就因为这波分析，家长转头就开始举报她。先是举报侵犯隐私，可视频做了变声处理，没有泄露隐私；随后她又向复旦大学多个部门投诉，举报教授直播影响教学、工作失职。
潮新闻报道称，沈奕斐教授连日撰写情况说明、配合调查，连正常工作都无法开展。
复旦大学在接到了该名家长的层层举报后，严肃对待、秉公调查，始终严格遵循相关调查程序和取证流程，对事件做了全面彻底的核实。
在查清真相之后，复旦校方确认：沈奕斐教授在直播间对连麦案例的点评内容专业且客观、不逾越任何合规边界，其所做的连麦内容直播并没有影响正常教学秩序，也不存在所谓的“侵害第三方隐私权”等问题。最终，复旦大学研究后并未对沈奕斐给予任何形式的行政处分或专业处置。
According to Shen, the parent later filed complaints against her with multiple departments at Fudan University, accusing her of privacy violations and neglecting her teaching duties.
After receiving complaints from the parent, Fudan University conducted an investigation and concluded that Shen's livestream comments were professional and did not violate privacy rights or affect teaching activities. The university ultimately decided not to discipline her.
沈教授提到，视频下整整1000多条留言，不乏基层一线教师的委屈与心声。有人说自己被无理家长举报到失眠，有人说为了不惹麻烦只能对孩子睁一只眼闭一只眼，有人说明明用心教书却被步步紧逼，寒透了心……
The case struck a chord with many teachers online, with some saying repeated complaints from parents had left them exhausted.
记者注意到，半月谈曾报道，西南某基层教育局提供的台账显示，2024年1至8月，该局共收到128条举报教师的信息，经调查，仅7起举报基本属实。其余不属实的举报中，不乏恶意举报行为。
Chinese media have also raised concerns over excessive reporting against teachers. Data from a local education bureau in Southwest China showed that only seven of 128 complaints against teachers between January and August 2024 were found to be largely valid.
比如，当年4月，当地一名学生犯错被老师批评后，拨打市民服务热线举报相关教师“体罚殴打学生”“用棍棒打学生的手”“辱骂女生”，经核查均不属实。
21日，中国教师报刊载知名教育专家汤勇的文章称，值得深思的是，这种无成本、无底线的泛举报、滥投诉，正在悄然侵蚀教育生态的根基。
文章直言，如果诬告没有成本，胡闹可以持续不断，那么最终只会损害多数人的利益，冤枉不该冤枉的老师，伤害不该伤害的孩子。如果所有认真负责的老师最后都在压力里慢慢沉默，教育只剩下“别出事、别投诉、别惹麻烦”，那么最终老师，将会一个个躺平。
教育最好的样子，不是家长和老师互相防备，而是大家一起，包括有更多的沈奕斐教授，能真正站在“帮助孩子成长”的这一边。
九派评论20日亦发文称，家校本该是并肩的战友。信任一旦碎了，修复需要很久。举报被滥用，会冲垮童真的乐园，辜负辛勤的“园丁”，最终也将误了孩子的一生。
Media commentators and education experts have warned that unfounded complaints could gradually erode trust between schools and parents, ultimately harming both teachers and students.
对此，你怎么看？
来源：中国青年报 少年学报 潮新闻 中国教师报 九派评论 中国新闻周刊
跟着China Daily
精读英语新闻
“无痛”学英语，每天20分钟就够！
热门跟贴