流感作为我国重大公共卫生挑战之一,其高发病率与高疾病负担对防控工作提出紧迫要求。近日,由中国医师协会急诊医师分会、中华医学会急诊医学分会、北京急诊医学学会、解放军急救医学专业委员会联合修订的《成人流行性感冒诊疗规范急诊专家共识(2025版)》正式发布。此次共识是对2022版的重要迭代与深化,系统整合了近年来循证医学关键进展,聚焦于快速诊断技术的临床落地、新型抗病毒药物的规范化引入、以及中医药治疗的循证升级等核心环节,旨在构建更具响应力与实效性的急诊流感诊疗体系,为应对当前流感防控形势提供权威、前沿的临床指引。

一、快速检测,抢黄金救治:

核酸检测革新急诊流程

流感多在冬春季发病,因地域差异亦可全年发病。流感患者常有发热、肌肉疼痛、头痛、倦怠等全身症状,而咽痛、流涕和鼻塞等局部症状轻微。流感病毒引发多种并发症,并加重慢性基础疾病(推荐意见1-2)。

面对流感严峻形势,早期快速诊断是有效干预的前提,诊断前移与精准化成为核心策略。与传统的病毒分离培养(金标准但耗时长)[1-3]或血清学检测(对早期诊断价值有限)[4]相比,快速核酸检测在急诊情境下的优势明显,目前已逐步发展成为临床诊断中首选检测手段[5-6]。同时共识指出,快速抗原检测操作简便,适合即时检验,但敏感性低于PCR核酸检测,阴性结果不能排除感染,建议进一步通过PCR核酸检测以明确诊断。这一诊断策略的更新,体现了急诊医学对“时间窗”概念的重视,为后续的早期抗病毒治疗奠定了关键基础。共识推荐首选上呼吸道鼻咽样本进行RT-PCR检测流感病毒核酸。在无法进行核酸检测的情况下可采用抗原检测作为替代。在条件允许的情况下,推荐不同的检测方法组合应用以提高检测准确性(推荐意见4)。同时临床上需高度警惕流感病毒合并其他类型病原体混合感染,积极进行病原学的诊断与鉴别诊断(推荐意见5)。

打开网易新闻 查看精彩图片

图1 流感诊断和病情评估流程

二、拓新版图,注民族力量:

抗流感新药纳入权威共识

抗流感病毒药物分为 NAIs、RNA聚合酶抑制剂、血凝素抑制剂,对目前流行的甲型和乙型流感病毒均具有较高的敏感性,且安全性良好。(证据等级Ⅱ,推荐强度 B)(推荐意见 8)

打开网易新闻 查看精彩图片

图2抗病毒药物靶向作用机制

01

治疗方案

共识对抗病毒药物章节进行重要扩充,重点纳入近年来我国自主研发获批上市的新型抗流感药物,特别是RNA聚合酶抑制剂,此类药物通过抑制流感病毒RNA聚合酶复合体的不同亚基干扰病毒复制,包括靶向PA亚基的药物玛舒拉沙韦、玛硒洛沙韦;靶向PB2亚基的药物昂拉地韦。

在无并发症的青少年或成人流感患者(甲型流感99.9%)中开展的一项Ⅲ期RCT试验结果显示,玛舒拉沙韦与安慰剂相比可显著缩短流感症状持续时间(42.0 h vs. 63.0 h,P=0.002)和中位退热时间(19.7 h vs. 28.3 h,P = 0.009),病毒排毒停止中位时间为22 h(P<0.001)[7]。同时玛舒拉沙韦Ⅱ期研究是在唯一以乙型流感为主( 99.5% )的无并发症成人流感患者中开展的RCT,其结果与Ⅲ期结果类似,40 mg 玛舒拉沙韦同样可减少流感症状持续时间( 50.0 h vs.安慰剂 82.3 h) 和中位退热时间( 27.0 h vs.47.2 h),病毒排毒停止中位时间为 23.5 h[8]

在甲型和乙型流感的用药方案选择上,目前已上市的抗病毒药物多数对甲型和乙型流感均有明显疗效[7-17],其中昂拉地韦目前获批用于甲型流感患者[18]。考虑到服药的便捷性和用药依从性,推荐优先选择口服片剂的抗病毒药物( 按上市顺序) :奥司他韦、玛巴洛沙韦[14、19]、玛舒拉沙韦[7-8]、昂拉地韦[18]( 仅用于甲型流感) 、玛硒洛沙韦[15] 等。抗病毒治疗疗程一般为 5~7 天,疗程结束后若症状仍未缓解、有病毒复制依据或有免疫抑制状态时,可考虑延长抗病毒疗程至 10~14 天[20-21]; 有条件者应考虑进行耐药性检测以及时调整用药方案[22]。

02

应用时机

急诊非重症流感患者在病原学确诊后应及时给予抗病毒治疗。普通型流感( 非妊娠女性)、无重症高危因素者,需充分评估抗病毒治疗的风险和收益。而急诊重症及危重症流感患者应在发病 48 小时内启动抗病毒治疗[23-24],延长启动可能会增加重症率和病死率[25-26],尽早启动( 如 36 小时内) 可进一步降低下呼吸道感染风险[9]; 该类患者启动抗病毒治疗无需等待病原学确诊结果,但基于多病原合并感染带来的流感重症风险[27,28],仍建议及时进行病原学检测以指导治疗。发病超过 48 小时的急诊重症及危重症患者,仍需予以抗病毒治疗[9]。

由于 NAIs、血凝素抑制剂和RNA聚合酶抑制剂之间作用机制不同,目前尚未观察到靶点相关的交叉耐药现象。因此,若流感病毒对某一类( 或某一靶点) 抗病毒药物的敏感性下降,可考虑换用作用机制不同的其他类别药物治疗[29]。

打开网易新闻 查看精彩图片

三、中西合璧,推循证革新:

新版共识推动中西医并重抗流感

共识延续了“中西医并重”的诊疗原则,并对中药及中成药的应用进行了循证依据的更新。抗流感病毒的中药或中成药具有多靶点、耐药性低和退热效果佳等特点,根据临床表现辨证论治,在缓解流感症状、减少重症和缩短住院时间等方面具有一定优势(推荐意见10)。

总之,2025版共识系统更新了成人流感的诊疗与预防策略,为急诊实现早期识别与规范治疗提供实用指导。未来需通过研发广谱疫苗、新型药物与便捷诊断工具应对病毒变异挑战,并重点优化重症预警、个体化治疗与真实世界研究,同时强化多学科协作与资源整合,以全面提升我国流感诊疗的规范化与同质化水平。

参考文献:

[1] Dhakad S, Mali P C, Kaushik S, et al. Comparison of multiplex RT-PCR with virus isolation for detection, typing and sub-typing of influenza virus from influenza-like illness cases[J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2015, 33(1): 73-7.

[2] Jain R, Sharma H, Pena L, et al. Influenza virus: Genomic insights, evolution, and its clinical presentation[J]. Microb Pathog, 2025, 205: 107671.

[3] Chen L L, Weng H. Clinical significance of lower respiratory tract culture within 48 h of admission in patients with viral pneumonia: an observational study[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2024, 24(1): 372.

[4] Chen M I, Barr I G, Koh G C, et al. Serological response in RT-PCR confirmed H1N1-2009 influenza a by hemagglutination inhibition and virus neutralization assays: an observational study[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(8): e12474.

[5]Clark T W, Lindsley K, Wigmosta T B, et al. Rapid multiplex PCR for respiratory viruses reduces time to result and improves clinical care: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Infect, 2023, 86(5): 462-75.

[6] Huang H S, Tsai C L, Chang J, et al. Multiplex PCR system for the rapid diagnosis of respiratory virus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2018, 24(10): 1055-63.

[7] Wang Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, et al. Single-dose suraxavir marboxil for acute uncomplicated influenza in adults and adolescents: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2025, 31(2): 639-46.

[8]Wang Y, Wang H, Liu D, et al. Efficacy and safety of single-dose suraxavir marboxil tablet in the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza in adults: a multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2025, 31(5): 861-8.

[9] Dobson J, Whitley R J, Pocock S, et al. Oseltamivir treatment for influenza in adults: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9979): 1729-37.

[10] Hanula R, Bortolussi-Courval É, Mendel A, et al. Evaluation of Oseltamivir Used to Prevent Hospitalization in Outpatients With Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2024, 184(1): 18-27.

[11] Jackson R J, Cooper K L, Tappenden P, et al. Oseltamivir, zanamivir and amantadine in the prevention of influenza: a systematic review[J]. J Infect, 2011, 62(1): 14-25.

[12] Chen J Y, Wei S K, Lai C C, et al. A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Peramivir with Other Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza Treatment[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2020, 56(2).

[13] Fang Y H, Hsu T H, Lin T Y, et al. Comparing intravenous peramivir with oral oseltamivir for patients with influenza: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2021, 19(8): 1039-46.

[14] Hayden F G, Sugaya N, Hirotsu N, et al. Baloxavir Marboxil for Uncomplicated Influenza in Adults and Adolescents[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(10): 913-23.

[15] Wang H, Wang G, Gao Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of ZX-7101A, an inhibitor of influenza cap-dependent endonuclease, in adults with uncomplicated influenza: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2025, 31(2): 274-81.

[16] Hayden F G, Lenk R P, Stonis L, et al. Favipiravir Treatment of Uncomplicated Influenza in Adults: Results of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials[J]. J Infect Dis, 2022, 226(10): 1790-9.

[17] Hanaki N, Sakaniwa R, Moromizato T, et al. Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy for Seasonal Influenza in Young and Middle-aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis[J]. Intern Med, 2024, 63(21): 2913-22.

[18] Yang Z, Zhan Y, Li Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of onradivir in adults with acute uncomplicated influenza A infection in China: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and oseltamivir-controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2025, 13(7): 597-610.

[19] Kuo Y C, Lai C C, Wang Y H, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil in the treatment of influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2021, 54(5): 865-75.

[20] Wang Y, Fan G, Salam A, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Combined Favipiravir and Oseltamivir Therapy Versus Oseltamivir Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients With Influenza Virus Infection[J]. J Infect Dis, 2020, 221(10): 1688-98.

[21] Cizeron A, Saunier F, Gagneux-Brunon A, et al. Low rate of oseltamivir prescription among adults and children with confirmed influenza illness in France during the 2018-19 influenza season[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2021, 76(4): 1057-62.

[22] Huang W J, Cheng Y H, Tan M J, et al. Epidemiological and virological surveillance of influenza viruses in China during 2020-2021[J]. Infect Dis Poverty, 2022, 11(1): 74.

[23] Cai J, Wang H, Ye X, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of Baloxavir Marboxil or Oseltamivir in outpatients with uncomplicated influenza A: an ambispective, observational, multi-center study[J]. Front Microbiol, 2024, 15: 1428095.

[24] Wang R Y, Wang Y, Wang X X, et al. Analysis of infection indicators and risk factors for influenza A after the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. New Microbiol, 2024, 47(3): 269-74.

[25] Muthuri S G, Venkatesan S, Myles P R, et al. Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in reducing mortality in patients admitted to hospital with influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection: a meta-analysis of individual participant data[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2014, 2(5): 395-404.

[26] Tenforde M W, Noah K P, O'Halloran A C, et al. Timing of Influenza Antiviral Therapy and Risk of Death in Adults Hospitalized With Influenza-Associated Pneumonia, Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET), 2012-2019[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2025, 80(2): 461-8.

[27] Liu Y, Wang Y, Mai H, et al. Clinical characteristics, risk factors and antiviral treatments of influenza in immunosuppressed inpatients in Beijing during the 2015-2020 influenza seasons[J]. Virol J, 2022, 19(1): 11.

[28] Zhang Y, Zhao J, Zou X, et al. Severity of influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus coinfections in hospitalized adult patients[J]. J Clin Virol, 2020, 133: 104685.

[29] Jones J C, Yen H L, Adams P, et al. Influenza antivirals and their role in pandemic preparedness[J]. Antiviral Res, 2023, 210: 105499.

免责声明:本文仅作最新前沿信息交流之目的,仅供医疗卫生行业专业人士阅读参考,文中所有观点不代表梅斯医学立场,亦不代表梅斯医学支持或反对文中观点。如需获得治疗方案指导,请前往正规医院就诊!